← Back to Daily Permits
🛢️ SANDERS 34-27 6H
Devon Energy Williston, LLC · McKenzie County, North Dakota County, ND · File #41620 · Generated 2026-02-13 12:33
- API
- 3305310525
- Target Formation
- Middle Bakken
- Permit Explained
- Partially
📋 Permit Cycle Assessment
The well file contains two direct permit-conditioning signals: (1) the Suspension of Drilling approval (03/19/2025) which directly enabled the two-phase drilling strategy executed (small rig surface hole May 3–May ~8, 2025; main rig lateral drilling August 2–6, 2025); and (2) geologist letter dated 2/25/2025 imposing mandatory cuttings sampling and core collection requirements under ND Century Code §38-08-04. The APD itself (dated 05/15/2025, permit type New Well-Horizontal) anchors to Commission Order No. 33659 and stipulates standard setback geometry (150' N/S, 500' E/W) tied to production-liner cemented-toe design with wet-shoe frac-out capability. The well location plat, well-path design (with KOP at 10,943' MD, curve to 11,730' MD, lateral to 21,700' MD in Middle Bakken), and off-spacing notifications to adjacent operators (Murex Petroleum, Whiting/Chord Energy) per NDIC Orders 31973 and 31848 are documented and contemporaneous. However, no permit review decision letter or drill-approval order letter is present in the file that explicitly states the regulatory rationale for granting the APD on 05/15/2025 or references specific technical submissions (anticollision study, geologic assessment, or detailed completion design) that justified the approval. The geologist report (drilling operations summary dated 08/2025, well completion) is post-spud and therefore reflects actual performance rather than pre-permit justification. Waivers for open-hole logs and tubing/packer are supportive but do not themselves explain the permit grant. Thus, while operational constraints and mandatory submissions are clearly documented, the file lacks explicit pre-permit technical justification or regulatory order articulating why the APD was approved.
🔍 Permit Cycle Signals (4)
📄 Sundry Form FORM ID 236997, dated 03/18/2025, Status: Approved, Effective Date: 03/19/2025
📅 03/19/2025 (Exact confidence)
SOD approval is a non-routine condition that directly enabled the phased drilling sequence executed in the well (surface hole drilled May 3, 2025; lateral drilling completed August 6, 2025). The regulator imposed specific operational constraints: small rig surface hole with freshwater mud, no saltwater in surface casing operations, mandatory plug/mechanical seal placement, and obligation to plug/abandon if main rig did not arrive within 90 days. Field inspector call-in requirements were stipulated.
📄 Sundry Form FORM ID 236983, dated 03/18/2025, Status: Approved, Effective Date: 03/18/2025
📅 03/18/2025 (Exact confidence)
Non-routine waiver of logging requirement; approved via NDIC #21431. Operator relied on documented proximity of offset well to satisfy formation-definition and risk-assessment criteria, reducing operational burden but placing conditional reliance on offset data integrity.
📄 Sundry Form FORM ID 237013, dated 03/18/2025, Status: Approved, Effective Date: 03/18/2025; Approximate Start Date: 11/10/2025
📅 03/18/2025 (Exact confidence)
Non-routine completion design waiver conditioned on documented casing strength, low-pressure flowback environment, and real-time monitoring. Indicative of cost-optimization strategy aligned with completion schedule (planned start ~Nov 2025), but no evidence this waiver was exercised or relevant to drilling permit approval timing.
📄 Sundry Form FORM ID 236989, dated 03/18/2025, Status: Approved, Effective Date: 03/21/2025
📅 03/21/2025 (Exact confidence)
Routine waiver based on drilling fluid selection (no filtration system). Does not explain permit approval; included for completeness as time-bound operational constraint.
📖 Historical Context (3)
Offset well Stallion 33-28 3H (NDIC File #35843) used as basis for open-hole log waiver; formation-top data from offset incorporated into Sanders 34-27 6H geologic prognosis.
📄 Sundry Form FORM ID 236983 (Open Hole Log Waiver); Well Location Plat and Coordinate Table (showing Stallion 33-28 wells in proximity); Formation Tops table (Sanders 34-27 6H) showing prognosed tops aligned with offset data. · 📅 Unknown
Validity of formation-top predictions and drilling safety depend on offset-data accuracy. Any reinterpretation or revision to Stallion 33-28 3H geologic model would require reassessment of Sanders 34-27 6H drilling hazards and potential drilling-restriction review.
Well operates off-spacing unit boundary into adjacent spacing units (NDIC Orders 31973, 31848 triggered); operator notified adjacent operators (Murex Petroleum, Whiting/Chord Energy) per regulatory requirement; wellbore lateral enters SE 27 from surface location in SE 33.
📄 Affidavit by Victoria Siemieniewski dated 01/17/2025 (signed 01/17/2025); Well Location Plat sheets showing SHL in SESE 33, T151N, R101W and BHL projected to SESE 27, T151N, R101W. · 📅 Unknown
Off-spacing drilling creates standing obligation to maintain directional control and well-bore isolation as drilled. Any wellbore deviation or casing failure affecting adjacent acreage could trigger liability or re-certification requirements. Adjacent operators retain potential development or enforcement rights under NDIC orders.
Samples and cores mandatory collection per ND Century Code §38-08-04: drill cuttings at 30' intervals (vertical/build) and 200' intervals (lateral); submission to State Geologist within 30 days of drilling completion; cores (if cut) within 180 days.
📄 Letter dated 2/25/2025 from Ross Edison, Geologist, NDIC Oil & Gas Division, captioned 'CORES AND SAMPLES' · 📅 Unknown
Operator remains liable for compliance with ND Century Code §38-08-16 (civil penalty up to $12,500 per violation, each day a separate offense). Non-submission or late submission carries enforceable penalty exposure. Samples are public record (upon request, post-confidential period lift) and inform state subsurface database and geologic assessment.
🔧 Operator Pattern
Devon Energy Williston, LLC structured phased drilling strategy (small-rig surface section, main-rig lateral section) to optimize rig-scheduling and cost efficiency. Operator sought and obtained regulatory waivers for non-standard completion design (tubing/packer exemption), logging (offset-well equivalency), and filter management (no-filtration statement). Operator complied with off-spacing notification and surface-damage settlement requirements.
Suspension of Drilling request (03/18/2025, approved 03/19/2025) explicitly cited cost and time savings; phased drilling executed as approved (spud 05/03/2025, surface hole ~5 days, curve/lateral drilling 08/02–08/06/2025). Tubing/Packer Waiver (03/18/2025, approved 03/18/2025) submitted with engineering justification. Affidavit of Surface Damage Agreement (02/10/2025) and off-spacing notifications (01/17/2025) demonstrate operator operational-risk management and regulatory compliance discipline.
Confidence: Medium
The file contains comprehensive drilling operations documentation (geologist report, cuttings logs, formation samples), well-design plans (location plat, well-path sections, casing design), regulatory submissions (Sundry Notices, waivers, off-spacing affidavits), and standard APD boilerplate. The Suspension of Drilling approval and geologist-imposed sampling requirements are clearly documented and time-bound. However, the file does NOT contain an explicit permit-approval letter from the NDIC articulating the technical or regulatory basis for granting the APD on 05/15/2025. The geologist report is post-spud (operations summary completed 08/28/2025 after drilling finished 08/06/2025) and therefore documents actual results rather than pre-permit justification. Open-hole log and tubing/packer waivers are pre-permit but are supportive conditions, not explanations of the permit grant itself. The absence of a decision letter or drill-order rationale, combined with post-spud reporting, limits confidence in fully explaining the permit-cycle approval logic; all essential operational constraints are documented, but the regulator's explicit findings are missing.