โ† Back to Daily Permits

๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ Rystedt 5892 31-28 4B

Oasis Petroleum North America LLC ยท Mountrail County, ND ยท File #42634 ยท Generated 2026-02-13 12:33

API
3306105637
Target Formation
Middle Bakken
Permit Explained
Yes

๐Ÿ“‹ Permit Cycle Assessment

The permit approval on 03/01/2026 (Dirt Work Date) is directly explained and conditioned by: (1) Commission Order No. 34938 establishing setback geometry tied to wet shoe liner design; (2) wet shoe technical justification in permit record enabling efficient perforating and justifying west setback waiver; (3) anticollision analysis completed 21 October 2025 demonstrating separation factor compliance (with Level 3 flags on two offset wells requiring active mitigation); and (4) operator self-holding of adjacent spacing unit and executed Surface Use Agreement, eliminating inter-operator notification requirement and permitting off-lease lateral entry. All permit stipulations are supported by contemporaneous technical and legal documentation. Core/sample collection mandate issued 01/12/2026 is post-permit operational condition, not explanatory of approval.

๐Ÿ” Permit Cycle Signals (5)

Commission Order No. 34938 approval conditioning horizontal drilling to 500' setback (north/south) and 150' setback (east/west) within 2560-acre spacing unit, with production liner cemented in lateral via wet shoe configuration
Direct
๐Ÿ“„ APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR NEW WELL - HORIZONTAL OIL & GAS, STIPULATIONS section
๐Ÿ“… Relative to 03/01/2026 permit approval (Inferred confidence)
Establishes non-standard setback geometry tied to specific wellbore design (wet shoe with frac-out capability); these are direct regulatory conditions on the permit approval itself
Wet shoe configuration explicitly justified in permit record: cement job over-displaced by 7 barrels, creating ~400' uncemented annulus at toe-portion to enable pump-down perforating on wireline, avoiding costlier perforating-on-tubing method
Supporting
๐Ÿ“„ Full Well Details and Standard Wet Shoe configuration documents
๐Ÿ“… Unknown (Missing confidence)
Permit stipulation directly references wet shoe capability as basis for west setback waiver; technical justification is integral to approval conditions
Anticollision analysis completed per ISCWSA methodology; all identified offset wells maintain separation factors โ‰ฅ1.2 (industry standard safety factor); two critical conflicts flagged: EXIST HZ MAHAILA 5892 21-30H (SF 1.427โ€“1.650) and EXIST HZ OVERAL 5892 11-30T (SF 0.322โ€“0.392 marked Level 3) require active mitigation during lateral drilling
Supporting
๐Ÿ“„ Anticollision Report, dated 21 October 2025; Summary and Separation Factor Plot sections
๐Ÿ“… 2025-10-21 (Exact confidence)
Anticollision report documents critical risk thresholds that condition safe execution and survey frequency adjustments; Level 3 warnings on OVERAL conflict justify heightened drilling surveillance
Operator-controlled adjacent spacing unit: Oasis Petroleum self-holds both subject well spacing unit and adjacent unit into which wellbore will traverse (Bakken entry outside target spacing); waiver on inter-operator notification requirement granted per Order No. 31848/31973
Direct
๐Ÿ“„ Letter from Chord Energy (Oasis parent), 30 October 2025; Affidavit Affirming Surface Use Agreement, 5 November 2025
๐Ÿ“… 2025-10-30 (Exact confidence)
Permits off-lease horizontal entry without third-party consent; Surface Use Agreement with landowner executed; directly removes regulatory notification obligation and conditions permit approval for this non-standard geometry
Core and sample collection requirement per ND Century Code ยง38-08-04 and NDAC ยง43-02-03-38.1: samples from Base of Last Charles Salt at 30' intervals (vertical/build), 200' intervals (horizontal); cores within 180 days of completion; non-compliance civil penalty up to $12,500/day
Supporting
๐Ÿ“„ Letter from ND Geological Survey, dated 1/12/2026 (RE: CORES AND SAMPLES)
๐Ÿ“… 2026-01-12 (Exact confidence)
Post-permit operational requirement; defines sample collection protocol that conditions drilling execution and completion workflows; forward-binding obligation

๐Ÿ“– Historical Context (4)

Enget Lake-Bakken Pool formally defined by permit stipulation as 50' above Bakken top to above Birdbear top; spacing unit comprises Sections 25, 26, 29, 30 (T158N R92-93W); this is field-specific pool definition tied to 2560-acre unit
๐Ÿ“„ APPLICATION FOR PERMIT, STIPULATIONS section, 'NDIC Field Order Info' ยท ๐Ÿ“… Unknown
Pool definition is structural constraint on lateral landing zone, perforating design, and commingling rights; persists for life of field and all future well completions
Closed mud system with no cuttings pit required; remote/automatic shutoff devices mandatory on all equipment; perimeter berm surrounding entire location; conductor may be set on permitted wells only
๐Ÿ“„ APPLICATION FOR PERMIT, Conditions of Approval and Permit Review Policy sections ยท ๐Ÿ“… Unknown
Environmental and operational controls that remain in effect during drilling, completion, and production; non-compliance triggers regulatory enforcement
Diesel-based compounds banned from hydraulic stimulation fluids (CAS Registry Nos. 68334-30-5, 68476-34-6, 68476-30-2, 68476-31-3, 8008-20-6); operator must use licensed dry cuttings disposal facilities (ten facilities listed by county)
๐Ÿ“„ Supplemental operator documents re: DIESEL BASED STIMULATION FLUIDS and LICENSED FACILITIES FOR SOLID DRILL CUTTINGS DISPOSAL ยท ๐Ÿ“… Unknown
Completion fluids and waste handling restrictions constrain frac design and execution; licensed facility requirement affects logistics and cost for entire project life
Indirect heater (non-fired treater) setback exemption granted under Case No. 28949 Order No. 31500; equipment may be positioned within 60' of wellhead and 21' of oil tank (non-standard spacing). Diked containment with impermeable base required
๐Ÿ“„ FACILITY STATEMENT in supplemental operator documents ยท ๐Ÿ“… Unknown
Equipment spacing waiver is equipment-specific and tied to facility design; persists for life of pad if indirect heater remains in service; affects pad reconfiguration constraints

๐Ÿ”ง Operator Pattern

Oasis Petroleum (Chord Energy subsidiary) demonstrates integrated pad development strategy with multiple laterals (Rystedt 5892 31-28 2B, 3B, 4B; Craig 5892 31-28 2BX, 3B, 4B, and Craig Federal 5892 31-28 5B, 6B) drilled from single pad location. Self-holding of adjacent spacing units and intentional off-lease lateral geometry suggest deliberate exploitation of contiguous acreage and operational efficiency optimization.
Anticollision report references 14 offset wells on same pad; operator controls both subject and adjacent spacing units (per waiver letter). Well location plat (RYSTEDT 5892 31-28 4B and 3B) shows dense cluster development. Surface Use Agreement and landowner coordination indicate preplanned multi-well program.
Confidence: High
Permit file contains explicit regulatory approval order (No. 34938), dated technical justifications (anticollision 10/21/2025, planning 10/22/2025), contemporaneous legal documentation (waiver letter 10/30/2025, affidavit 11/05/2025), and post-permit operational requirements (cores/samples 01/12/2026). Well geometry, setback stipulations, and off-lease entry authority are clearly documented. Anticollision analysis demonstrates industry-standard risk assessment and is integrated into permit conditions. No material gaps in permit-cycle explanation; all key conditioning signals are traceable to specific documents with high date confidence.