← Back to Daily Permits
OTHER
Permit approval was directly conditioned on specific setback requirements and cementing practices, supported by off-spacing notifications and anti-collision measures.
🛢️ RS-Piepkorn-155-92-1208H-4
Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC · Mountrail County, ND · File #42899 · Generated 2026-05-26 02:39
- API
- 3306105684
- Target Formation
- Bakken
- Permit Explained
- Yes
📋 Permit Cycle Assessment
Permit approval was directly conditioned on specific setback requirements and cementing practices, supported by off-spacing notifications and anti-collision measures.
🔍 Permit Cycle Signals (4)
📄 Permit Stipulations
📅 2026-05-05 (Exact confidence)
Specific setback requirements tied to well geometry
📄 Conditions of Approval
📅 2026-05-05 (Exact confidence)
Technical justification for reduced east setback
📄 Drilling Permit Affidavit
📅 2026-03-25 (Exact confidence)
Regulatory requirement per Order No. 31973
📄 Operator Assertions
📅 2026-03-19 (Exact confidence)
Mitigates collision risks with existing wellbores
📖 Historical Context (2)
Surface Use Agreement granting rights for off-spacing operations through Sections 7, 8, and 12
📄 Affidavit · 📅 2026-03-23
Obligates operator to ongoing surface use terms beyond this permit
BLM notification requirement for federal mineral impacts
📄 Email from NDIC · 📅 2026-04-21
Requires future coordination for federal mineral development
Confidence: High
Direct regulatory conditions and supporting technical documents are explicitly tied to the permit approval