← Back to Daily Permits
COMPLETION
Completion: The permit contains direct conditions referencing Order 35503 and a specific well design (cemented liner with wet shoe) that justifies the north setback. A non-standard pre-construction contact requirement is also present. A log waiver request is submitted. However, the document lacks a specific con
Updated 2026-10-14 · was Sep 30, 2026 · +1 page · Full diff →

GO-Beyer-158-98-3415H-3

HESS BAKKEN INVESTMENTS II, LLC · Williams County, ND · File #43349 · Generated 2026-10-14 06:31

API
3310506899
Target Formation
Bakken
Permit Explained
Partially

Permit Cycle Assessment

The permit contains direct conditions referencing Order 35503 and a specific well design (cemented liner with wet shoe) that justifies the north setback. A non-standard pre-construction contact requirement is also present. A log waiver request is submitted. However, the document lacks a specific contemporaneous narrative (e.g., a recent stipulation letter) explicitly detailing the reason for this permit cycle's approval beyond the cited order and conditions.

Permit Cycle Signals (4)

Approval conditioned on compliance with Commission Order No. 35503, specifically requiring a 150' setback from north & south boundaries and a 500' setback from east & west boundaries within the 2560-acre spacing unit.
Direct
Permit Information - STIPULATIONS section (Page 1)
Unknown (Missing confidence)
This is the primary regulatory condition referenced in the permit, tying approval to a specific Commission Order and non-standard setbacks for the spacing unit.
North setback justification: 'The north setback is based on a production liner cemented in the lateral with a wet shoe and the ability to frac out the shoe.'
Direct
Permit Information - NDIC Field Order Info (Page 1)
Relative (Inferred confidence)
Directly justifies a specific permit condition (north setback) by citing a unique well construction design (cemented liner with wet shoe), differentiating it from routine boilerplate.
Requirement for Hess to contact NDIC Field Inspector Robert Stafford prior to location construction.
Direct
Permit Information - Conditions of Approval (Page 1)
Unknown (Missing confidence)
A direct, non-standard regulatory condition requiring pre-construction contact with a specific inspector, conditioning the permit approval.
Waiver request for standard open hole logs (Acoustic/Sonic, Density/Porosity, Resistivity).
Supporting
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION - PROPOSED LOGS (Page 4)
Unknown (Missing confidence)
A technical submission (waiver request) justifying a deviation from standard permit requirements, which would need regulatory approval.

Historical Context (2)

Off-spacing/off-lease drilling: The Surface Use Agreement (via affidavit) grants rights to drill into off-lease/off-spacing units (Sections 14, 15, 18, 22, 23, 26, 27, 34, 35, T158N, R98W).
AFFIDAVIT - STATEMENT (Page near end of file) · 2026-03-01
Establishes a persistent surface right obligation that permits future drilling into units not underlying the surface location, affecting future permit applications and operational planning for this pad.
Notice provided to offset operator (Kraken Operating, LLC) regarding wellbores entering their adjacent spacing unit in the Bakken Petroleum System, as required by rule.
DRILLING PERMIT AFFIDAVIT (Page near end of file) · 2026-07-13
Creates a documented regulatory obligation and neighbor notification precedent. Future operations or communications with Kraken may be conditioned by this prior notice, and it demonstrates compliance with a rule that persists for any similar future activity.

Operator Pattern

Standardized pad development with multi-well planning, use of centralized facilities, and proactive regulatory compliance (e.g., anti-collision standards, off-lease agreements, offset operator notifications).
Documents show planning for a 6-well pad (GO-Beyer H-1 through H-4, GO-Binde H-1, GO-Skjei H-4), centralized test/group facility design, detailed anti-collision protocols in the APD, and executed surface use agreements for off-spacing operations.
Confidence: Medium
Key permit conditions (Order 35503, setback justification, inspector contact) are clearly identified. Historical context is well-documented via affidavits. However, the precise regulatory trigger for this permit (e.g., a new stipulation letter) is not explicitly dated or separated from the approved permit form, and some dates (e.g., for Order 35503) are missing, limiting time-bound certainty.