← Back to Daily Permits
SUNDRY
Sundry: The permit file contains contemporaneous documentation explaining the permit action. Direct regulatory conditions (Order 35252 setbacks, aquifer stipulation) and supporting justifications (wet shoe for south setback, off-lease SUA affidavit, adjacent operator waiver) are present and time-bound to th
Updated 2026-10-14 · was Oct 6, 2026 · +1 page · Full diff →

Weasley 4595 33-29 2B

OASIS PETROLEUM NORTH AMERICA LLC · Dunn County, ND · File #43373 · Generated 2026-10-14 06:31

API
3302505250
Target Formation
Bakken
Permit Explained
Yes

Permit Cycle Assessment

The permit file contains contemporaneous documentation explaining the permit action. Direct regulatory conditions (Order 35252 setbacks, aquifer stipulation) and supporting justifications (wet shoe for south setback, off-lease SUA affidavit, adjacent operator waiver) are present and time-bound to the permit.

Permit Cycle Signals (5)

Permit approval is conditioned on Commission Order No. 35252, requiring wellbore portions not isolated by cement to maintain specific setbacks (150' N/S, 500' E/W) within the 1920-acre spacing unit.
Direct
Permit Information - STIPULATIONS - NDIC Field Order Info
Unknown (Missing confidence)
This is a direct, non-standard condition of approval tied to a specific Commission Order, establishing the legal framework for the permit.
Special Attention stipulation: An onsite inspection is required due to well location on an aquifer, mandating a closed mud system with no drilling pit, an impermeable liner, and additional site-specific stipulations at the Field Inspector's discretion.
Direct
Permit Information - STIPULATIONS - SPECIAL ATTENTION
Unknown (Missing confidence)
This is a direct, non-routine regulatory stipulation triggered by a specific site condition (aquifer location) and conditions the permit approval.
The south setback (150') is justified based on a production liner cemented in the lateral with a wet shoe and the ability to frac out the shoe.
Direct
Permit Information - STIPULATIONS - NDIC Field Order Info
Unknown (Missing confidence)
This directly explains the rationale for a specific permit condition (the south setback), linking it to the proposed well construction (wet shoe completion).
Affidavit affirming Surface Use Agreement executed for off-lease drilling from the pad location.
Supporting
Well File - Affidavit
2026-08-31 (Exact confidence)
This is a supporting document required for permit approval because the well is drilling 'off-lease' from the pad location, addressing a specific regulatory condition.
Waiver request for adjacent operator notification pursuant to Order No. 31973, as Oasis is the operator of the adjacent unit.
Supporting
Well File - Letter dated September 2nd, 2026
2026-09-02 (Exact confidence)
This is a supporting submission that justifies waiving a standard permit requirement (adjacent operator notification), directly facilitating the permit.

Historical Context (2)

Special Attention stipulation for aquifer location imposes persistent operational constraints: mandatory closed mud system, no drilling pit, impermeable liner, and ongoing Field Inspector discretion for site-specific requirements.
Permit Information - STIPULATIONS - SPECIAL ATTENTION · Unknown
These are not one-time permit conditions but ongoing operational obligations for location construction, drilling, and site integrity that must be adhered to throughout the well's execution phase.
The well is part of a multi-well pad (Gryffindor 4595 33-29 Pad) with several other proposed wells (Potter, Granger Federal, Dumbledore Federal series).
Various sheets (S-1A, S-3A, S-3B, Affidavit, C-2) · Relative
Future pad operations, scheduling, anti-collision management, and surface use are interdependent, creating persistent coordination obligations and shared infrastructure responsibilities beyond this single permit.
Confidence: High
The permit and associated documents (affidavit, waiver request) provide clear, direct regulatory conditions and supporting technical/legal justifications. Dates for supporting submissions are present. The separation between permit-cycle signals (anchored to approval conditions) and historical context (persistent pad obligations) is unambiguous.