← Back to Daily Permits
OTHER
The permit approval on 2026-02-13 is clearly explained and justified by Commission Orders 34736 and 34884, which condition drilling authorization on strict 150-foot setbacks from spacing unit boundaries and require production liner design with wet shoe completion to support those setbacks. The opera
🛢️ EN-Aicha-156-94-3416H-2
Hess Bakken Investments II, LLC · Mountrail County, ND · File #42715 · Generated 2026-05-26 02:39
- API
- 3306105649
- Target Formation
- Bakken
- Permit Explained
- Yes
📋 Permit Cycle Assessment
The permit approval on 2026-02-13 is clearly explained and justified by Commission Orders 34736 and 34884, which condition drilling authorization on strict 150-foot setbacks from spacing unit boundaries and require production liner design with wet shoe completion to support those setbacks. The operator's anti-collision analysis using 1.5 separation factor, real-time surveying, and gamma ray geo-steering substantiates approval of the off-spacing infill geometry. The permit grants an explicit exception to Manitou-Bakken Pool spacing requirements to accommodate the lateral's encroachment on protruding corners. Post-drilling verification via Sundry Notice submission gates completion operations, ensuring as-built compliance with the approved setback order. All material conditioning terms are time-bound to this permit and derive from identifiable regulatory orders or operator technical submissions.
🔍 Permit Cycle Signals (5)
📄 Permit page 1, STIPULATIONS section
📅 2026-02-13 (Exact confidence)
Regulator-issued setback condition tied to specific well geometry and spacing unit configuration. Directly constrains wellbore placement within the 2560-acre unit.
📄 Permit page 2, Conditions of Approval
📅 2026-02-13 (Exact confidence)
Post-drilling regulatory gate conditioning completion on verification of as-built compliance with setback order. Demonstrates regulator concern for actual wellbore geometry against permitted trajectory.
📄 Permit page 3, Bakken Setback Summary Statement
📅 2026-02-13 (Exact confidence)
Technical completion design explicitly referenced by regulator to justify permit conditions. Ties casing/cement strategy to setback allowance.
📄 Permit page 9, Anti-Collision Statement
📅 2026-02-13 (Exact confidence)
Operator-submitted anti-collision protocol directly supporting approval of off-spacing well with complex lateral geometry in congested section. Demonstrates risk management for neighboring wellbores.
📄 Permit page 2, well location and spacing description
📅 2026-02-13 (Exact confidence)
Explicit regulatory waiver of standard spacing to allow infill development geometry. Non-routine approval tied to specific well design and encroachment footprint.
📖 Historical Context (3)
Surface Use Agreement dated 2019-09-27 executed with Rice Ranch LLLP authorizing right to construct and maintain well sites and drill 'off lease' wells into Sections 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, and 34, T156N-R94W, and Sections 27 and 34 for EN-LALIM B-156-94-3427H-1
📄 Affidavit pages, dated 2025-09-11 · 📅 Unknown
Surface use authorization for off-spacing drilling persists as operational requirement. Defines permissible drilling footprint and land access rights for all wells on the pad, including EN-AICHA-156-94-3416H-2.
Hess affidavit dated 2025-04-21 from Completion Engineering Team certifying that Halliburton Energy Services does not use diesel fuels (CAS 68334-30-5, 68476-34-6, 68476-30-2, 68479-31-3, 8008-20-6) in hydraulic fracturing for Hess Bakken Project wells in North Dakota
📄 Affidavit section, dated 2025-04-21 · 📅 Unknown
Regulatory compliance assertion covering all Hess Bakken wells, including this well. Establishes operator commitment to fuel restriction that may be required by permit conditions or NDIC rules and persists through completion phase.
Waiver request under Commission Order No. 31973 filed 2025-08-05 citing that Hess is both operator of target spacing unit and adjacent unit (EN-RICE-A-155-94-0310), thereby meeting waiver criteria and eliminating notice requirements for directional plan disclosure to adjacent operators
📄 Letter dated 2025-08-05 from Derek Abrahamsen, Hess Sr. Land Negotiator · 📅 Unknown
Demonstrates Hess operational control over both drilling and adjacent units, eliminating inter-operator disclosure obligations. Structural fact that affects future coordination and notice requirements.
🔧 Operator Pattern
Hess operates multi-well infill pads with centralized drilling and completion infrastructure, integrating off-spacing laterals from single surface location using shared facilities and access infrastructure.
Permit file shows five wells planned from EN-LALIM B / AICHA 156-94 PAD (EN-AICHA-156-94-3416H-2, 3, 4, 5 and EN-LALIM B-156-94-3427H-1), all sharing graded pad, perimeter berm, electrical, and production facilities. Hess owns/operates both target and adjacent spacing units. Anti-collision standards and survey protocols are standardized across Hess operations. Directional planning by certified vendor (Scientific Drilling) with gamma ray geo-steering capability.
Confidence: High
Permit document is complete, dated, and signed by approving PE (Nathaniel Erbele, 2026-02-13). All material stipulations, conditions, and regulatory orders are explicitly stated and clearly tied to permit approval. Anti-collision report, directional plan, and casing/cement design supporting documents are integral to file. Surface use agreement and operator affidavits are dated and notarized. No critical dates are missing or inferred. Well geometry (off-spacing, protruding corners, setback exceptions) is non-routine and fully documented in permit justification.